Skip to main content

Say What? The Bizarre Logic of "Returning" PhilHealth Funds

There is a certain audacity in the way public officials explain the mismanagement of our nation's funds—an almost comedic confidence in the absurdity of their reasoning. Take, for instance, the recent revelation that a significant sum has been siphoned from PhilHealth, the national health insurance system, and is now, by their own admission, gone.

But fear not, they say! The missing funds will be included in next year's budget. How reassuring! What an elegant solution!

Except, wait—where will this budget allocation come from? The answer is as predictable as it is infuriating: from our taxes. That is, the money taken from PhilHealth, the contributions of millions of Filipinos over decades, has been used up—on what, we can only speculate—and now, they will replace it using fresh funds from us, the taxpayers.

Let’s break this down:

  1. We paid into PhilHealth to secure healthcare coverage.

  2. The government took that money and used it elsewhere.

  3. Now, instead of recovering the lost funds from those responsible, they plan to refill PhilHealth’s coffers with new money—our money, again.

This is not reimbursement. This is not accountability. This is a blatant cycle of exploitation.

One cannot help but detect the distinct stench of plunder in the air. The Anti-Plunder Law (RA 7080) defines plunder as the act of public officials amassing ill-gotten wealth amounting to at least ₱50 million through criminal acts. If public funds are being misappropriated on a large scale, and then simply "replaced" using taxpayers' money rather than holding the perpetrators accountable, does this not warrant scrutiny under this law?

Perhaps I have misunderstood. Perhaps there is some sophisticated fiscal strategy at play that escapes my comprehension. But let’s be real: does this not reek of the same corruption that has plagued our institutions for decades?

If there is nothing to hide, then let there be full transparency:

  • Where did the money go?

  • Who authorized its use?

  • Why are those responsible not being prosecuted?

  • And why must we, the people, bear the cost of their misdeeds?

Filipinos deserve answers, not gaslighting.

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Commission on Audit's Unmodified Opinion on the Office of the Vice President: A Political Vindication?

The Commission on Audit (COA), the supreme audit institution of the Philippines, has released its independent auditor’s report on the financial statements of the Office of the Vice President (OVP) for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2023. The findings are clear: an unmodified opinion, confirming that the OVP’s financial statements fairly present its financial position in accordance with International Public Sector Accounting Standards (IPSASs). Breakdown of the COA Report Key Elements: 1. Header: The COA logo prominently displayed. Official name: Commission on Audit, Republic of the Philippines. Address: Commonwealth Avenue, Quezon City. Title: INDEPENDENT AUDITOR’S REPORT. 2. Addressee: The report is addressed to "The Honorable Vice President, Republic of the Philippines" with the specific address of the Office of the Vice President included. Opinion Section: The subject of the audit is the financial statements of the OVP as of December 31, 2023. The audit encompasses ke...
Post a Comment
Read more

The Marcos Administration’s Assault on Sovereignty and Rule of Law

History has shown that those intoxicated by power eventually overstep their bounds, mistaking their momentary control for invincibility. The administration of Ferdinand "Bongbong" Marcos Jr. has now demonstrated precisely this folly, trampling on legal principles and constitutional safeguards in a brazen display of political opportunism. In its reckless pursuit of consolidating authority, the Marcos regime has blatantly violated the rights of former President Rodrigo Duterte, exposing both its authoritarian tendencies and its profound ignorance of international law. The Illusion of Unchecked Power Power corrupts, and absolute power corrupts absolutely. The current administration’s actions suggest a dangerous detachment from reality, a belief that the Office of the President is above scrutiny. It is reminiscent of the cognitive decay induced by illicit substances—once the mind is affected, there is no telling what reckless behavior will follow. Marcos Jr. and his allies have g...
Post a Comment
Read more

The Decline of Malacañang’s Messaging Under Claire Castro

The role of a presidential spokesperson is not simply to parrot the administration’s talking points—it is to frame the government’s narrative in a way that is coherent, persuasive, and, at the very least, grounded in some form of political strategy. Yet under Claire Castro, the function of the Malacañang spokesperson has been reduced to little more than reactionary deflections and hollow platitudes. A Crisis of Competence Where previous spokespersons—whether one agreed with them or not—displayed at least some level of rhetorical skill and grasp of governance, Castro appears to lack even the most basic ability to articulate policy positions. The likes of Harry Roque, Salvador Panelo, or even the more pragmatic Edwin Lacierda could defend their administrations with calculated arguments, strategic misdirections, or even legal gymnastics. Castro, in contrast, has managed to devolve the role into something almost unrecognizable—where responses to critical issues sound more like barroom re...
Post a Comment
Read more