Skip to main content

The Weaponization of “Fake News” in the Service of Power

The fight against disinformation, when wielded by those in power, is rarely about truth. It is about control. The Philippine House of Representatives has positioned itself as the vanguard against fake news, yet its selectivity exposes the real objective. Will it summon GMA News to answer for its baseless claim that former President Rodrigo Duterte sought asylum in China? Will it demand accountability from those who spread misinformation that conveniently serves the ruling order? Or is the inquisition reserved only for critics of the Marcos Jr. administration?

The answer is self-evident. Fake news is not the real concern—dissent is. The state does not seek to dismantle disinformation; it seeks to monopolize it. The function of “fake news investigations” is not to correct falsehoods but to create a chilling effect, a warning to journalists, opposition figures, and ordinary citizens alike: speak against the regime, and you will be scrutinized, harassed, and possibly silenced.

This asymmetry in the enforcement of truth reveals a deeper pathology in Philippine governance. The ruling elite understands that control over information is control over perception, and control over perception is control over power. When a narrative emerges that threatens this control—be it electoral fraud allegations, corruption exposés, or critiques of governance—it is swiftly labeled as fake news, and its sources are dragged before congressional panels. But when a fabricated claim like Duterte seeking asylum in China surfaces, implicating an opposition figure, the machinery of outrage falls silent.

In this framework, “truth” is not an objective standard but a political weapon. The regime determines what is real and what is false, who is credible and who is suspect, who must answer for their words and who is granted impunity. This is not a fight against disinformation—it is the institutionalization of state propaganda, wrapped in the rhetoric of justice.

If the House truly sought to combat fake news, it would demand transparency and accountability from all sources of misinformation, including those aligned with the administration. But it will not. Because in a system designed to sustain power rather than uphold truth, investigations are not about facts—they are about silencing those who refuse to comply.

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Commission on Audit's Unmodified Opinion on the Office of the Vice President: A Political Vindication?

The Commission on Audit (COA), the supreme audit institution of the Philippines, has released its independent auditor’s report on the financial statements of the Office of the Vice President (OVP) for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2023. The findings are clear: an unmodified opinion, confirming that the OVP’s financial statements fairly present its financial position in accordance with International Public Sector Accounting Standards (IPSASs). Breakdown of the COA Report Key Elements: 1. Header: The COA logo prominently displayed. Official name: Commission on Audit, Republic of the Philippines. Address: Commonwealth Avenue, Quezon City. Title: INDEPENDENT AUDITOR’S REPORT. 2. Addressee: The report is addressed to "The Honorable Vice President, Republic of the Philippines" with the specific address of the Office of the Vice President included. Opinion Section: The subject of the audit is the financial statements of the OVP as of December 31, 2023. The audit encompasses ke...
Post a Comment
Read more

The Marcos Administration’s Assault on Sovereignty and Rule of Law

History has shown that those intoxicated by power eventually overstep their bounds, mistaking their momentary control for invincibility. The administration of Ferdinand "Bongbong" Marcos Jr. has now demonstrated precisely this folly, trampling on legal principles and constitutional safeguards in a brazen display of political opportunism. In its reckless pursuit of consolidating authority, the Marcos regime has blatantly violated the rights of former President Rodrigo Duterte, exposing both its authoritarian tendencies and its profound ignorance of international law. The Illusion of Unchecked Power Power corrupts, and absolute power corrupts absolutely. The current administration’s actions suggest a dangerous detachment from reality, a belief that the Office of the President is above scrutiny. It is reminiscent of the cognitive decay induced by illicit substances—once the mind is affected, there is no telling what reckless behavior will follow. Marcos Jr. and his allies have g...
Post a Comment
Read more

The Decline of Malacañang’s Messaging Under Claire Castro

The role of a presidential spokesperson is not simply to parrot the administration’s talking points—it is to frame the government’s narrative in a way that is coherent, persuasive, and, at the very least, grounded in some form of political strategy. Yet under Claire Castro, the function of the Malacañang spokesperson has been reduced to little more than reactionary deflections and hollow platitudes. A Crisis of Competence Where previous spokespersons—whether one agreed with them or not—displayed at least some level of rhetorical skill and grasp of governance, Castro appears to lack even the most basic ability to articulate policy positions. The likes of Harry Roque, Salvador Panelo, or even the more pragmatic Edwin Lacierda could defend their administrations with calculated arguments, strategic misdirections, or even legal gymnastics. Castro, in contrast, has managed to devolve the role into something almost unrecognizable—where responses to critical issues sound more like barroom re...
Post a Comment
Read more