The Power of the Image and the Fear of Its Implications

Numbers, in the hands of the powerful, are malleable. They can be inflated or diminished, manipulated to serve an agenda. Whether the media insists that 6,000 or 2,000 Filipinos gathered in The Hague is ultimately irrelevant. The essential fact remains: thousands stood in solidarity for an 80-year-old retired president facing international scrutiny.

Foreign observers will not obsess over headcounts; they will ask the far more uncomfortable question—Why? What compels Filipinos, from all walks of life, to leave their jobs, homes, and daily routines to rally in the streets of a foreign city? Why do they defy a government that, by all measures, holds the instruments of state power? The spectacle of such a gathering carries a symbolic weight that cannot be erased by statistical revisionism.

The Marcos Jr. administration and its allies fear this, as all regimes do when confronted by the raw, unfiltered image of dissent. They understand that in the theater of global politics, perception is reality. The sight of a mass mobilization in The Hague sends a message that no government-sanctioned press release can easily counter: that the legitimacy of their rule is contested not just at home, but in the eyes of the world.

This is why control of the narrative is paramount. Reducing the crowd size, framing the protest as insignificant, or discrediting its participants are tactics of those who understand that the struggle for power is, at its core, a battle over perception. But the problem for authoritarian figures is that the most powerful symbols are not dictated from above—they emerge from below, in the streets, in the voices of the people, in the sheer undeniable presence of bodies gathered in defiance.

Governments can manipulate statistics. They can dictate headlines. But they cannot erase the image of history unfolding in real time.

Comments

Commission on Audit's Unmodified Opinion on the Office of the Vice President: A Political Vindication?

The Commission on Audit (COA), the supreme audit institution of the Philippines, has released its independent auditor’s report on the financial statements of the Office of the Vice President (OVP) for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2023. The findings are clear: an unmodified opinion, confirming that the OVP’s financial statements fairly present its financial position in accordance with International Public Sector Accounting Standards (IPSASs). Breakdown of the COA Report Key Elements: 1. Header: The COA logo prominently displayed. Official name: Commission on Audit, Republic of the Philippines. Address: Commonwealth Avenue, Quezon City. Title: INDEPENDENT AUDITOR’S REPORT. 2. Addressee: The report is addressed to "The Honorable Vice President, Republic of the Philippines" with the specific address of the Office of the Vice President included. Opinion Section: The subject of the audit is the financial statements of the OVP as of December 31, 2023. The audit encompasses ke...

The Marcos Administration’s Assault on Sovereignty and Rule of Law

History has shown that those intoxicated by power eventually overstep their bounds, mistaking their momentary control for invincibility. The administration of Ferdinand "Bongbong" Marcos Jr. has now demonstrated precisely this folly, trampling on legal principles and constitutional safeguards in a brazen display of political opportunism. In its reckless pursuit of consolidating authority, the Marcos regime has blatantly violated the rights of former President Rodrigo Duterte, exposing both its authoritarian tendencies and its profound ignorance of international law. The Illusion of Unchecked Power Power corrupts, and absolute power corrupts absolutely. The current administration’s actions suggest a dangerous detachment from reality, a belief that the Office of the President is above scrutiny. It is reminiscent of the cognitive decay induced by illicit substances—once the mind is affected, there is no telling what reckless behavior will follow. Marcos Jr. and his allies have g...

The Decline of Malacañang’s Messaging Under Claire Castro

The role of a presidential spokesperson is not simply to parrot the administration’s talking points—it is to frame the government’s narrative in a way that is coherent, persuasive, and, at the very least, grounded in some form of political strategy. Yet under Claire Castro, the function of the Malacañang spokesperson has been reduced to little more than reactionary deflections and hollow platitudes. A Crisis of Competence Where previous spokespersons—whether one agreed with them or not—displayed at least some level of rhetorical skill and grasp of governance, Castro appears to lack even the most basic ability to articulate policy positions. The likes of Harry Roque, Salvador Panelo, or even the more pragmatic Edwin Lacierda could defend their administrations with calculated arguments, strategic misdirections, or even legal gymnastics. Castro, in contrast, has managed to devolve the role into something almost unrecognizable—where responses to critical issues sound more like barroom re...

Alexander Bonifacio

Search This Blog