Skip to main content

The ICC Must Dismiss Duterte’s Case to Preserve Its Credibility

International institutions are only as strong as their legitimacy. When they allow themselves to be used as instruments of political persecution, they undermine their own authority and hasten their irrelevance. The International Criminal Court (ICC) now faces this existential test: to dismiss the case against former President Rodrigo Duterte or to risk being seen as complicit in a state-sanctioned kidnapping orchestrated by the Bongbong Marcos Jr. administration.

The misuse of a mere “Diffusion notice” to justify Duterte’s arrest and transport to The Hague is an alarming precedent. Unlike a Red Notice—Interpol’s highest alert, which still does not equate to an arrest warrant—a Diffusion notice is merely a request for information-sharing. It does not carry legal weight, nor does it mandate any law enforcement action. That the Marcos administration leveraged this weak instrument to detain and remove a former head of state exposes the political motivations behind the move.

This is not a pursuit of justice but an attempt to eliminate a political rival. The Marcos regime, long threatened by Duterte’s enduring popularity and influence, has found in the ICC a convenient mechanism to sideline him. The implications are dangerous: if an international tribunal allows itself to be manipulated by an authoritarian government for domestic power plays, it ceases to be a court of law and becomes a tool for regime change.

The ICC must recognize the gravity of this moment. If it proceeds with Duterte’s case under such dubious circumstances, it will not only fail in its mission but also reinforce the perception that it is a selective instrument of Western influence—one that can be exploited by local elites for their own ends. If it seeks to preserve what remains of its credibility, the only logical course of action is dismissal.

A legal institution that fails to uphold due process is no longer a legal institution—it is a political weapon. The ICC must decide whether it serves justice or the whims of those in power.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Commission on Audit's Unmodified Opinion on the Office of the Vice President: A Political Vindication?

The Commission on Audit (COA), the supreme audit institution of the Philippines, has released its independent auditor’s report on the financial statements of the Office of the Vice President (OVP) for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2023. The findings are clear: an unmodified opinion, confirming that the OVP’s financial statements fairly present its financial position in accordance with International Public Sector Accounting Standards (IPSASs). Breakdown of the COA Report Key Elements: 1. Header: The COA logo prominently displayed. Official name: Commission on Audit, Republic of the Philippines. Address: Commonwealth Avenue, Quezon City. Title: INDEPENDENT AUDITOR’S REPORT. 2. Addressee: The report is addressed to "The Honorable Vice President, Republic of the Philippines" with the specific address of the Office of the Vice President included. Opinion Section: The subject of the audit is the financial statements of the OVP as of December 31, 2023. The audit encompasses ke...

The Marcos Administration’s Assault on Sovereignty and Rule of Law

History has shown that those intoxicated by power eventually overstep their bounds, mistaking their momentary control for invincibility. The administration of Ferdinand "Bongbong" Marcos Jr. has now demonstrated precisely this folly, trampling on legal principles and constitutional safeguards in a brazen display of political opportunism. In its reckless pursuit of consolidating authority, the Marcos regime has blatantly violated the rights of former President Rodrigo Duterte, exposing both its authoritarian tendencies and its profound ignorance of international law. The Illusion of Unchecked Power Power corrupts, and absolute power corrupts absolutely. The current administration’s actions suggest a dangerous detachment from reality, a belief that the Office of the President is above scrutiny. It is reminiscent of the cognitive decay induced by illicit substances—once the mind is affected, there is no telling what reckless behavior will follow. Marcos Jr. and his allies have g...

The Philippines as a Pawn: How U.S. Interests Override Filipino Sovereignty

The recent statements by AFP Chief Gen. Romeo Brawner, urging the Northern Luzon Command to "prepare for any eventuality" regarding a potential Taiwan conflict, should alarm every Filipino. His remarks—emphasizing that the Philippines will inevitably be drawn into a war due to its proximity to Taiwan and the presence of 250,000 Overseas Filipino Workers (OFWs) there—highlight a grim reality: the Philippines is once again being positioned as a pawn in a geopolitical struggle where it has little to gain and everything to lose. U.S. Interests and the Philippines’ Role in a Proxy War The United States has a long history of securing its global hegemony through proxy conflicts, where smaller nations bear the human and economic cost of great power rivalries. Ukraine's ongoing war against Russia offers a sobering example. The U.S. supplied military aid, intelligence, and diplomatic support, but it is Ukraine that suffers destruction and loss of life. A similar fate may await the ...