Skip to main content

Rodrigo Duterte and the ICC: How a Prison Became a Tourist Attraction

Only in the Philippines can a former president turn a supposed detention center into a tourist spot. The International Criminal Court (ICC) may have envisioned a high-profile prosecution, but what they didn’t anticipate was their facility becoming an extension of the Filipino diaspora—complete with selfies, pasalubong requests, and an impromptu meet-and-greet session.

It’s almost poetic. The ICC, an institution designed to intimidate, now finds itself hosting Filipinos eager to catch a glimpse of a leader they still revere. Even the guards, trained to handle hardened criminals, are now dealing with a different challenge: politely declining endless photo requests. Has The Hague ever seen anything like this? A man so vilified by Western institutions yet so celebrated by his own people that even his detention becomes a pilgrimage site?

This isn’t about Duterte alone; it’s about the cultural disconnect between foreign legal institutions and the will of the people. To the ICC, he’s a defendant. To the thousands who rallied in The Hague and beyond, he’s a symbol—of resistance, of leadership, of a nation’s defiance against foreign interference. If the goal was to weaken his image, the strategy has backfired spectacularly. Instead of cowering in shame, Duterte has inadvertently created an international curiosity: a prison that attracts supporters instead of condemners.

And so the irony persists. The West can build its courts, draft its warrants, and issue its summons. But they cannot dictate how people perceive their leaders. If Duterte ever walks into that prison, he won’t be walking alone. The world will be watching, and the cameras won’t belong to prosecutors—they’ll belong to the Filipino people, capturing history in the making.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Commission on Audit's Unmodified Opinion on the Office of the Vice President: A Political Vindication?

The Commission on Audit (COA), the supreme audit institution of the Philippines, has released its independent auditor’s report on the financial statements of the Office of the Vice President (OVP) for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2023. The findings are clear: an unmodified opinion, confirming that the OVP’s financial statements fairly present its financial position in accordance with International Public Sector Accounting Standards (IPSASs). Breakdown of the COA Report Key Elements: 1. Header: The COA logo prominently displayed. Official name: Commission on Audit, Republic of the Philippines. Address: Commonwealth Avenue, Quezon City. Title: INDEPENDENT AUDITOR’S REPORT. 2. Addressee: The report is addressed to "The Honorable Vice President, Republic of the Philippines" with the specific address of the Office of the Vice President included. Opinion Section: The subject of the audit is the financial statements of the OVP as of December 31, 2023. The audit encompasses ke...

The Marcos Administration’s Assault on Sovereignty and Rule of Law

History has shown that those intoxicated by power eventually overstep their bounds, mistaking their momentary control for invincibility. The administration of Ferdinand "Bongbong" Marcos Jr. has now demonstrated precisely this folly, trampling on legal principles and constitutional safeguards in a brazen display of political opportunism. In its reckless pursuit of consolidating authority, the Marcos regime has blatantly violated the rights of former President Rodrigo Duterte, exposing both its authoritarian tendencies and its profound ignorance of international law. The Illusion of Unchecked Power Power corrupts, and absolute power corrupts absolutely. The current administration’s actions suggest a dangerous detachment from reality, a belief that the Office of the President is above scrutiny. It is reminiscent of the cognitive decay induced by illicit substances—once the mind is affected, there is no telling what reckless behavior will follow. Marcos Jr. and his allies have g...

The Decline of Malacañang’s Messaging Under Claire Castro

The role of a presidential spokesperson is not simply to parrot the administration’s talking points—it is to frame the government’s narrative in a way that is coherent, persuasive, and, at the very least, grounded in some form of political strategy. Yet under Claire Castro, the function of the Malacañang spokesperson has been reduced to little more than reactionary deflections and hollow platitudes. A Crisis of Competence Where previous spokespersons—whether one agreed with them or not—displayed at least some level of rhetorical skill and grasp of governance, Castro appears to lack even the most basic ability to articulate policy positions. The likes of Harry Roque, Salvador Panelo, or even the more pragmatic Edwin Lacierda could defend their administrations with calculated arguments, strategic misdirections, or even legal gymnastics. Castro, in contrast, has managed to devolve the role into something almost unrecognizable—where responses to critical issues sound more like barroom re...